Twenty One Members of Congress Send Letter to President Trump Objecting to Recent Executive Orders

Twenty One Members of Congress Send Letter to President Trump Objecting to Recent Executive Orders

On June 11, 2018 the following letter was sent to President Trump signed by 21 members of Congress objecting to his recent Executive Orders regarding federal employees.

See the full text of the letter below. Or download a pdf here.

June 11,2018

The Honorable Donald Trump
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania A venue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Trump:

We are writing to express our objections to the recent Executive Orders issued on May 25, 2018, providing guidance to all federal agencies involving employee representation rights, collective bargaining, and due process.

As Members representing a significant number of hard working federal employees and retirees, we urge you to uphold the current law and long-standing federal labor statutes that protect America’s civil service from discrimination, unfair treatment, and sexual harassment.

Federal employees work to secure our borders, keep our airways safe, support our military, and maintain order by policing our communities. In fact, we are proud that more than 30 percent of the federal workforce is comprised of veterans who have also served our country through military service. Federal workers have taken an oath of service to our great nation, and we take very seriously their duty to provide the American public with quality services. That is why we believe that now, more than ever, it is important to uphold and strengthen the working relationships between federal workers and agency leadership.

Management and labor must work collaboratively to ensure that the workplace is safe, fair, and productive. The federal government is most efficient when these two entities can work together to address challenges and improve the delivery of public services. When such a system exists, the result is agency cost savings. Tax payers deserve a government they can trust to provide important public services, and they also expect a just and fair government.

As one of the largest employers in the nation, and as stewards of taxpayer dollars we must ensure that the federal government strives to be a model employer that provides stellar services to the American public. We are concerned that the recent Executive Orders embark upon a path that will undo many of the longstanding principles protected by law, which establish checks and balances not only in the federal workplace, but for the American public.

We believe that the three Executive Orders undermine existing labor laws and we ask that you rescind them.

Pelosi Statement on Trump Rollback of Federal Worker Protections

Pelosi Statement on Trump Rollback of Federal Worker Protections

San Francisco – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi issued this statement after President Trump issued executive orders rolling back decades-long protections for federal workers, making it easier to fire workers, slashing official time and urging agencies to negotiate contracts unfavorable to workers:

“President Trump’s executive orders strike a sweeping blow to the time-honored and legally-mandated freedom for federal employees to negotiate better futures.  His spiteful attack on the men and women of labor hurts workers and their families, and devastates the efficacy of the federal workforce.  It is particularly egregious that the President, spurred by Congressional Republicans, is taking a hatchet to official time, which is a vital tool for addressing serious workplace grievances, including sexual harassment claims.  With no justification, the President has moved to eliminate workers’ freedom to seek justice, dignity and equality in the workplace.

“These executive orders are the latest salvo in the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans’ cynical campaign against labor and federal workers.  From the start, Republicans have fought to gut official time, slash federal employee compensation through pay freezes and cuts to FERS, and cripple the workforce with hiring freezes and unfilled vacancies.

“Democrats are committed to giving workers A Better Deal, with Better Jobs, Better Wages and a Better Future, by working to ban laws that undermine workers’ freedom to negotiate through unions, ensure accountability for predatory corporations that violate workers’ rights and strengthen the right to strike for better wages and working conditions.  Democrats will never stop fighting to protect every hard-working American’s right to a fair shot in today’s economy.”

See the Executive Order

President Hart’s Letter to Congress Urging Them to Block Trumps Executive Orders on the Federal Workforce

President Hart’s Letter to Congress Urging Them to Block Trumps Executive Orders on the Federal Workforce

Dear Speaker Ryan, Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leaders Pelosi and Schumer:

This past Friday, May 25, 2018, President Trump usurped Congressional authority as well as undermined settled policy and law when he issued three executive orders denying the rights of federal workers contained within Title 5 governing civilian personnel matters.

Title 5 is the driving factor that ensures that corruption, patronage, and politics do not influence the federal workforce. However, President Trump disregarded the constraints on his constitutional powers, and unilaterally proclaimed what amounts to be new law — despite the fact that bipartisan majorities of both houses of Congress have consistently supported Title 5.

The Metal Trades Department, and its 17 affiliated International Unions, have one simple request, stand with the federal workforce and take legal action to block the implementation of the President’s unlawful actions.

America’s workers are counting on you to transcend the banality of partisan politics that threaten the core of our democratic institutions. The workers that comprise the Metal Trades Department, AFL-CIO, respectfully and forcefully request that you confront, and stop, the President’s illegal actions.


Holman Rule Alert—House GOP Tries to Renew ‘Holman Rule’ Targeting Federal Pay

By Kellie Mejdrich, CQ

March 19, 2018 – 10:01 p.m.

House Republican leaders have proposed extending a rule that allows cuts to individual federal employees’ salaries as part of a measure approved late Monday night setting up floor procedure for two unrelated bills.

Tucked into a floor rule (H Res 787) that tees up consideration for two unrelated bills (HR 4566HR 5247) relating to financial services and health policy is a provision that extends the “Holman rule.” The Holman rule is a standing order provided in the House rules adopted in January 2017 (H Res 5). Previously, the Holman rule was in order through the first session of the 115th Congress, and the new rule introduced Monday would extend it through the second session.

The Holman rule, created in 1876 by Rep. William S. Holman, D-Ind., allows floor amendments on appropriations bills to target individual salaries or workforce levels. The rule essentially permits floor amendments that “retrench” expenditures — in other words, cut spending — using legislative language that was not previously authorized. The cuts could reduce federal salaries, compensation from the Treasury and amounts of money in individual spending bills.

The House in July considered a Holman rule amendment as part of the Republican-written omnibus measure (HR 3219). Proposed by Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., the amendment would have cut a certain division of the Congressional Budget Office. It was rejected by a vote of 116-309 on July 26.

House Republicans’ decision to reinstate the rule now for the second session of the 115th Congress may signal a willingness by leadership to give rank-and-file members broader latitude to force cuts in spending bills.

But that type of procedure can be difficult for the House majority to manage because it can be used as a dilatory procedure by the minority. As House Rules Chairman Pete Sessions, R-Texas, recalled in January 2017: “Certainly, I mean, if you go back and look how it was used  . . .  what term would you put to it, ‘abused?’ Or ‘utilized?’”

Most of the provisions that are known as the Holman rule were removed from the standing rules in 1983. House Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., spoke out against reinstating the rule in April 2016 during a Rules Committee hearing.

Cole said the proposal “would significantly expand what amendments could be offered on appropriations bills” and “would diminish the roles of the authorizing committees, make them less central to the legislative process and at the same time make it harder to pass appropriations bills.”

Cole said reinstating the rule “would involve appropriations bills in more controversies and increase the number of amendments to appropriations bills, which has already exploded in recent years.”

He noted at the hearing that during the last year in which the Holman rule was in effect, 59 floor amendments had been offered to 10 appropriations bills brought to the floor. In 2015, 456 amendments were proposed on just seven bills.

AFL-CIO and Affiliated Federal Unions Oppose Closure of FLRA Regional Offices

AFL-CIO and Affiliated Federal Unions Oppose Closure of FLRA Regional Offices

In a letter to all U.S. Senators the AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions representing federal employees expressed deep concern regarding the recent announcement by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) that it intends to close its regional offices in Dallas and Boston.

The letter urges Congress to prohibit the closures and position eliminations that would occur should closures happen.

See the full text of the letter below.

March 5, 2018

Dear Senator:

On behalf of the undersigned unions representing more than one million federal employees who work in virtually every Executive Branch agency across the country and around the world, we write to express our deep concern regarding the recent announcement by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) that it intends to close its regional offices in Dallas and Boston.

The FLRA plays a critical role in enforcing federal labor law through its adjudicatory and prosecutorial roles; it also trains union officers and agency officials on their rights and responsibilities under the law. The proposed reduction of critical frontline staff in the regional offices and the number of those regional offices would critically impede the FLRA’s ability to carry out its mission.

We are calling for a Government Accountability Office (GAO) to study the impact of the proposed closures on the ability of the FLRA to carry out its mission as the law intends both nationally and in the regions that would be affected by the closures.  Until the GAO report is completed and Congress has had the opportunity to consider the impact of these proposed closures, we urge the Congress to include in the FY18 Omnibus a provision explicitly preventing the FLRA from closing the offices.

Closing two of four regional offices puts FLRA staff farther away from the parties relying on their services.  The harm is compounded by the reduction in the amount of funds allowing the staff to travel to conduct elections, representational hearings, onsite Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) investigations and other critical work that constitutes the agency’s core mission and allows its staff to build relationships with parties.

In February, Congress passed a two-year budget that increases funding to domestic agencies by $63 billion in 2018 and $68 billion in 2019.  The plan to close FLRA regional offices and eliminate other positions in FLRA headquarters was submitted before this additional funding was approved by Congress and agreed to by the President.  The additional funding over the next two years eliminates any rationale for reducing the FLRA’s resources.

For operational, mission, and budget reasons, it is clear that the FLRA’s plan to close two regional offices should not go forward.  It would undermine the agency’s ability to carry out its mission, and was devised under budgetary and policy assumptions that are no longer current or accurate.  Until the GAO is able to provide Congress with an analysis of the effect of the proposed closures, we ask that Congress prohibit the closures and position eliminations.  If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Mia Dell of AFGE’s Legislative Department at 202-639-4003 or Byron Charlton of the AFL-CIO Department of Legislation at 202-637-5290.


American Federation of Labor Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)

American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)

National Association of Government Employees

International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF)

International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW)

Metal Trades Department, AFL-CIO

International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE)

Seafarers International Union

Federal Education Association

National Federation of Federal Employees


Notification from DoD regarding potential lapse in Appropriations.

As many of you are aware, annual funding for the government expires on January 19th. The Administration does not believe it is necessary for a lapse in funding to occur, and looks forward to working with the Congress to finalize appropriations for this year.

However, prudent management requires that we be prepared for all contingencies, including the possibility that a lapse could occur. A lapse would mean that a number of government activities would cease due to a lack of appropriated funding, and that a number of employees would be temporarily furloughed. To prepare for this possibility, we are working to update our contingency plans for executing an orderly shutdown of activities that would be affected by a lapse in appropriations.

Thank you for your hard work, dedication, and patience through this process, and for all that you do for the employees of the Department of Defense and the American people.

It is expected that your local representatives may receive further information from local management. The DCPAS public website also contains useful information regarding
furlough within the DoD at: