Ohio company makes bid for Northrop Grumman shipbuilding

A little-known Cleveland-based firm has bid to acquire the entire shipbuilding unit of Northrop Grumman Corp., including the big shipyard in Newport News that builds aircraft carriers and submarines for the Navy, a company executive confirmed Monday.

“To the best of our knowledge, we’re the only company that has made an offer on the entire enterprise,” said Ed Bartlett, president and CEO of Cleveland Ship LLC.

Terms of the offer have not been disclosed, but Northrop’s shipbuilding division may be worth as much as $4.6 billion at an average industry multiple, according to Bloomberg News.

If successful, Cleveland Ship would acquire Northrop Grumman’s shipyards in Newport News; Pascagoula, Miss.; and Avondale, La.; as well as two subsidiaries, AMSEC LLC, based in Virginia Beach, and Continental Maritime, a San Diego ship repair facility.

The acquisition company would be known as Cleveland Shipbuilding Group Inc., and Northrop’s Newport News facility would become “CSG Newport News Shipbuilding,” Bartlett said.

Cleveland Ship’s offer comes a little more than two months after Northrop Grumman announced in mid-July that it was closing the Avondale yard and exploring “strategic alternatives” for its shipbuilding unit, including a possible sale or spin off to shareholders.

With nearly 20,000 employees in Newport News, the shipyard is Virginia’s biggest industrial employer. It’s the only facility in the nation that build s the Navy’s aircraft carriers and one of just two that builds submarines.

The company submitted its unsolicited bid Sept. 23, one day before a deadline Northrop reportedly set for offers, according to Defense News, a trade publication that first reported the bid over the weekend.

Bartlett said a news conference is scheduled for later this week to present Cleveland Ship’s offer in more detail.

“It’s a multi-billion-dollar offer that, as far as we know, is completely consistent with Northrop Grumman’s expectations,” he said Monday.

The firm has union backing. Cleveland Ship plans to keep all of Northrop’s shipyards open and maintain current employment levels, said Ron Ault, president of the Metal Trades Department, AFL-CIO.

“It’s Ed’s business plan and his unusual vision that we find intriguing, particularly with the shipyard getting ready to close in Avondale, La.,” Ault said.

Hourly workers at the Newport News shipyard are represented by Local 8888 of the United Steelworkers of America.

The financing for Cleveland Ship’s bid has been arranged and sources provided to Northrop Grumman, Bartlett said. The equity is all from the United States, with no foreign partners, he said.

The Navy has said it would object to foreign ownership of key shipbuilding assets.

Bartlett said there are rumors of other firms interested in acquiring pieces of Northrop’s shipbuilding business, but that Cleveland Ship’s is the only one he knows that wants the whole operation.

“Our whole strategic intent is to own the business for the long term,” Bartlett said.

Neither Northrop nor the Navy would comment on Cleveland Ship’s bid in e-mail responses Monday.

Cleveland Ship LLC was formed only recently as part of a restructuring to complete this acquisition, Bartlett said. The enterprise that became Cleveland Ship was founded a little more than three years ago.

According to its website, www.clevelandship.com, the company was established to build, own and operate the Navy’s next class of fleet oilers.

While the firm does not own a shipyard, the executive team running the company brings decades of experience in finance and the maritime industry, Bartlett said.

The company’s top executives include Renold “Rod” Thompson Jr., chairman, a retired banker; Robert Monitello, chief financial officer and former audit partner at Ernst & Young; and Bartlett, former president of DRS Power Systems, a graduate of the Navy’s nuclear-power school and a former instructor in the advanced phase of Navy nuclear-power training, according to the website.

“We look forward, when the deal is successfully completed, to the privilege of working with the great shipbuilders in Newport News,” Bartlett said.

Industrial Policy and National Security

Industrial Policy and National Security

Testimony of Jeff Faux, Distinguished Fellow, Economic Policy Institute in a hearing before the subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, US House of Representatives.

Mr. Faux’s testimony discusses de-industrialization and national defense.

That the nation’s industrial base is vital to our national security was for most of our history a core assumption of American economic policy. The manufacturing sector had been a driver of our prosperity, a guarantor of our independence, and the basis
of our rise to world leadership. Had the United States not had the capacity to become the “arsenal of democracy,” the Second World War might well have ended differently.

The war’s end left the U.S. as the dominant manufacturing power in the world for some three decades. Our ability to provide our military with the most advanced weaponry and our civilians with the most advanced consumer goods were two sides of the same policy coin—with both sides crucial to the United States prevailing in the Cold War.

But, as we all know, over the last several decades the American industrial base has dramatically weakened. Economists debate the exact causes, but the decline in U.S. manufacturing has been thoroughly documented, and widely acknowledged by
both policymakers and the public. We have been running trade deficits in manufacturing for over thirty years, relentlessly off-shoring production and steadily losing ground in our capacity to produce cutting edge technologies.

Yet, the threat to our national security has not been reflected in our economic policies, or the way in which we are organized to meet the national security challenges of the future.

Click on the link below to read Mr. Faux’s complete testimony.
 EPI Testimony

Skip to toolbar